Petitioner sought quashing of a second auction notice and the fixed date for auction of mortgaged property. The court found the petition infructuous because the auction had already failed due to lack of bidders, and dismissed the writ.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5467 of 2018
===========================================================
Sanjay Kumar, Son of late Satyanarayan Singh, Resident of Ward No. 1, Issufchak, Takiya, Takiya Bazar Police Station- Sasaram Model Thana, DistrictRohtas.
... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
===========================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ratnesh Nandan Sinha,
Mr. Purusottam Prasad, Advocates
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-04-2018
The present writ petition has been filed for quashing of second auction sale notice dated 07.03.2018 published in the daily newspaper “Dainik Bhaskar” as well as “Hindustan Times” and the auction sale date fixed for auction of mortgaged property of the petitioner on 28.03.2018.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5467 of 2018 dt.11-04-2018
2/2
behalf of the petitioner in which the aforesaid stand has not been
disputed.
infructuous and accordingly stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/Chandran
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N.A. |
| Uploading Date |
14.04.2018 |
| Transmission Date |
N.A. |
Sanjay Kumar
The Bank of Baroda
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
