Disposed

Saroj Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC26 Oct 2018CWJC/5573/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition concerning pension payment. It allowed the petitioner to approach the University Registrar for review. If the payment was made in an unrevised scale, the University must revise it and pay the difference within one month.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to approach University Registrar; if payment was in unrevised scale, University to revise and pay difference within one month.

Saroj Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5573 of 2018

¶2

===========================================================

¶3

Saroj Devi, W/o- Chandrashekhar Purvey, R/o-Mohalla-Panjiar Toli, P.S.-Rosera, District-Samastipur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department, of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Deputy Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Vice-Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga.

¶10

The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga.

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Roona and Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocates For the State : Mr. Madanjit Kumar, G.P. 20 Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, A.C. to G.P. 20 For the L.N.M.U. : Mr. Jawed Gaffar Khan, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶12

Date: 26-10-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and L.N. Mithila University (hereinafter referred to as the ‘University’).

¶14

2^nd supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the University indicating payment of pension and family pension along with arrears.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same. However, she submitted that the payment is being made in the pre-revised scale, which is now required to be appropriately enhanced.

¶16

Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.5573 of 2018 dt.26-10-2018

¶18

2/2

¶19

stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to represent before the Registrar of the University in the matter. If such a representation is filed within three weeks from today, the Registrar shall look into the matter and if it is found that the payment made to the petitioner is in an unrevised scale, as per her entitlement, the same shall be appropriately revised and whatever amount is found payable on account of such revision, shall be paid to the petitioner within one month from the date of filing of the representation.

¶20

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶21

P. Kumar

¶22

AFR/NAFR U

Saroj Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saroj Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gyanwati Kumari and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Daya Sagar Verma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Punit Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Radhika Devi Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Nirmal Kumar Karan Vs The Bihar State Power Holding Pvt. Ltd. Through The General Manager and Ors.

Ranjit Kumar Tiwary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.