The High Court of Patna upheld the dismissal of a writ petition seeking salary payment. The petitioners failed to establish entitlement because verification with the issuing authority revealed that their appointment certificates were forged and fabricated.
Salary payment was denied and the writ petition was dismissed due to forged certificates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1809 of 2015
===========================================================
Daya Sagar Verma, Son of Sri Satya Narayan Prasad Verma, Resident of Village +P.O-Bichhwe, P.S-Sikandra, District - Jamui.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar and Mr. Mohan Kumar Singh, Advocates For the State : Mr. Karandeep Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 6 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 25-10-2018
Prayed is made on behalf of learned counsel for the
petitioner for time. Learned counsel for the State is present.
reliefs:
“1. That this application is being filed for directing the respondents to make payment of salary to petitioner which has not been paid since his joining on 24.12.2013 despite repeated representation of the petitioner.
2. That the petitioner prays for following RELIEFS
i) That the respondents may be directed to make payment of salary of the petitioner.
ii) That any other relief or reliefs may be allowed which will be just, proper and equitable on the opinion of this Hon’ble Court.
Patna High Court CWJC No.1809 of 2015 dt.25-10-2018
2/3
Patna High Court CWJC No.1809 of 2015 dt.25-10-2018
3/3
of the petitioner has been found to be forged and fabricated, upon verification from the Issuing Authority, the Court finds that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief claimed.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
P. Kumar
AFR/NAFR U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to unpaid salary given that the certificates substantiating his appointment were found to be forged.
Whether directions under Article 226 of the Constitution should be issued to grant salary when the petitioner's eligibility is based on fabricated certificates.
Daya Sagar Verma
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education
The Director, Primary Education
The District Education Officer, Jamui
The Block Education Officer
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
