Disposed

Barister Prasad v. The Managing Director, Food Corporation Of India and Ors.

Patna HC3 Dec 2018CWJC/4178/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner claimed gratuity interest after retirement. Court directed petitioner to submit representation to Respondent No. 4 within three weeks for disposal within six weeks, expecting interest issue to be considered then. Writ application disposed without pre-deciding interest claim.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit representation to Respondent No. 4 within three weeks for disposal within six weeks.

Barister Prasad Vs The Managing Director, Food… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4178 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Barister Prasad, S/o- Late Gopal Prasad, Resident of Village-Roochap, P.O.Sipaya, P.S.-Vishmabarpur, Dist-Gopalganj

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Managing Director, Food Corporation of India Head Quarters, 16-20 Brakhambha Lane, New Delhi.

¶7

The General Manager (Vig) Food Corporation of India, HQ, New Delhi.

¶8

The Dy. General Manager (Pers.) Food Corporation Of India Zonal Officer (East Kolkata.

¶9

The General Manager (Region), Food Corporation of India Regional Office, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna.

¶10

The Executive Director (East Zone), food Corporation of India.

¶11

The Dy. General Manager (S) East Zone, Kolkata.

¶12

The Area Manager, District Officer Food Corporation of India.

¶13

The Manager (A/cs), A.O. Food Corporation of India, District Officer, Srinandan Path, Chapra.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. For the F.C.I. : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 03-12-2018

¶20

Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned counsel for the F.C.I.

¶21

The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities to make payment of retiral dues to the petitioner.

¶22

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner retired from the post of AG II (Depo), F.C.I. on 31.12.2014. However, it is very fairly submitted that the retiral dues has been paid to the petitioner but the petitioner

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.4178 of 2017(2) dt.03-12-2018 2/2

¶24

further claims statutory interest on delayed payment of gratuity.

¶25

Learned counsel for the F.C.I. submits that question of

¶26

payment of statutory interest will be considered within a reasonable time frame.

¶27

In the circumstances, it is expected from the petitioner to submit a representation before Respondent No.4, the General Manager (Region), F.C.I. within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, whereupon it is expected from the concerned authority to dispose of the same within a period of six weeks of its submission.

¶28

Accordingly, with the above observation and direction, the present writ application is disposed of.

¶29

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶30

Amrendra/-

¶31

Barister Prasad v. The Managing Director, Food Corporation Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Barister Prasad v. The Managing Director, Food Corporation Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Suresh Mallik Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Piyush Chandra Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Raj Nararyan Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vishwa Vijay Mistry Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kanhaiya Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.