Piyush Chandra v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal miscellaneous application brought to mentioned docket; counsel appeared for both parties; court recorded that no order needed to be passed.
Criminal miscellaneous application brought to mentioned docket; counsel appeared for both parties; court recorded that no order needed to be passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37932 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2863 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna
====================================================== Piyush Chandra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
8 12-12-2018 The matter has been brought under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’ at the behest of learned counsel for the petitioner.
No order need to be passed.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Ashwini/-
U
Piyush Chandra
State Of Bihar
DINESH KUMAR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court