The High Court dismissed the writ petition because the petitioner failed to comply with its earlier order dated 06.10.2017, which directed payment of maintenance. The Court held that non-compliance precludes any further relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3055 of 2016
===========================================================
Chandra Kant Jha son of Sri Satya Narayan Jha, Resident of Flat No. 301, Sri Lok Apartment, near Water Tower, New Patliputra Colony, P.S.- S.K. Puri, DistrictPatna-800013, Bihar.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 22-11-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
in terms of the order passed by the Principal Court. The same has not been done till date.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3055 of 2016 dt.22-11-2018
2/2
whose order he chooses not to comply with.
stands dismissed.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
P. Kumar
AFR/NAFR U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition can be heard when the petitioner failed to comply with an earlier order regarding maintenance payment.
Chandra Kant Jha
The State of Bihar
The State of Jharkhand
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
