Disposed

Sheo Shankar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC20 Nov 2018CWJC/10789/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning the petitioner's admitted retirement benefits. The court noted that such benefits had been paid and left the petitioner to approach the competent authority for any remaining in-service claims.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed off. The petitioner is at liberty to move the concerned authority for any other dues regarding in-service claims.

Sheo Shankar Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10789 of 2017

¶2

===========================================================

¶3

Sheo Shankar Thakur, Son of Late Kallu Thakur, resident of Mohalla-Ganga Babu

¶4

Ki Theki, P.O.-Begampur, P.S.-Chowk Patna City, District-Patna.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar, through the Agriculture Production Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Agriculture Principal Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Managing Director, Bihar Rajya Beej Neegam, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Company Secretary, Bihar Rajya Beej Neegam, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Bihar, Patna.

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s

¶12

===========================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s	: Mr. Bishwa Nath Upadhyay, Advocate
For the State	: Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, G.P. 14

¶15

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶16

Date: 20-11-2018

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and

¶18

Bihar Rajya Beej Neegam Limited.

¶19

From the pleadings on record, it appears that the admitted retiral benefits of the petitioner have been paid.

¶20

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off.

¶21

However, if there are any other dues remaining with

¶22

regard to in service claim, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move before the authority concerned, who shall decide the same in

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.10789 of 2017 dt.20-11-2018

¶24

2/2

¶25

accordance with law.

¶26

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶27

Anand Kr.

¶28

AFR/NAFR U

Sheo Shankar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheo Shankar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prof. Om Prakash Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Balram Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bhola Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Snokanta Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Prakash Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.