The High Court, in dispatching multiple pending writ petitions, ordered the competent authority to decide the petitioners' question regarding tax refund within four weeks of filing this order, and disposed of the petitions accordingly.
The competent authority was directed to decide the question of refund within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2695 of 2018
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2756 of 2018
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2858 of 2018
======================================================
Patna High Court CWJC No.2695 of 2018 (2) dt.11-07-2018
2/4
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2886 of 2018
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3191 of 2018
====================================================== 1. M/s Durga Bricks, a partnership of firm having its place of business at National Highway-31, P.O. and District Kishanganj through its one of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.2695 of 2018 (2) dt.11-07-2018
3/4
partners Bimal Mittal son of Sri Lalit Kumar Mittal Resident of N.H. 31 (Near Caltex Chowck ) P.O. Kishanganj, P.S. Kishanganj and District Kishanganj.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : (In CWJC No.2695 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar- Sc11 (In CWJC No.2756 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar -Sc11 (In CWJC No.2858 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha -Ga1 (In CWJC No.2886 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal For the Respondent/s : Mr. A.K. Sinha- Ga1 (In CWJC No.3191 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha -Ga1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 11-07-2018 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it has been
seen that question about refund of tax to the petitioners are pending consideration before the competent authority, which shall
Patna High Court CWJC No.2695 of 2018 (2) dt.11-07-2018
4/4
be decided within a period of four weeks. On a certified copy of this order being filed before respondent No.3 The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Kishanganj Circle, Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj, the respondent No.3, Deputy Commissioner Commercial Tax, Kishanganaj Circle Kishanganj shall decide the question of refund in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation.
With the aforesaid these writ petitions stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
Sanjeev/-
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
U T
M/s Durga Bricks
The State of Bihar
The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Kishanganj Circle, Kishanganj
Rajendra Menon
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
