The High Court allowed an application for restoration of Letters Patent Appeal No.822 of 2015 dismissed due to default, directing that the appeal be restored to the original file.
L.P.A. No.822 of 2015 restored to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.488 of 2018
In
Letters Patent Appeal No.822 of 2015
======================================================
Rajeshwar Prasad, S/o Late Kuldeep Mahto, Resident of Village-Durgapur, P.S.-Giriyak, District-Nalanda at Present C/o Anand Kumar Sinha Advocate, Mohalla-Salempur Paizabapur Ward No. 01 P.S.-Barh, District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s :
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
L.P.A. No. 822 of 2015 which has been dismissed for default.
Patna High Court MJC No.488 of 2018(3) dt.10-07-2018 2/2
Keeping in view the reasons indicated in the
application, the same is allowed and L.P.A. No. 822 of 2015 is
restored to its original file.
Office objection ignored.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
P.K.P./-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to restore L.P.A. No.822 of 2015 dismissed for default.
Rajeshwar Prasad
The State of Bihar through the Secretary transport Bihar
Administrative, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Pvt. Ltd.
Administrator-in-Chief, B.S.T.C. Ltd.
The Travellar Manager Cum-Special Officer, B.S.T.C.
The Sub-Divisional Accounts Officer, Muzaffarpur
Rajendra Menon
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
