Dismissed

Siddharth Shankar Pathak v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC25 Jun 2018CWJC/17868/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna disposed of a writ petition concerning pending payments. After noting that substantial payments totaling approximately Rs. 35 lakhs had been made by the University, the court dismissed the petition but retained jurisdiction for four weeks to address any remaining unpaid dues.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed; liberty to file representation within 4 weeks if any amount remains unpaid.

Siddharth Shankar Pathak Vs The State Of Bihar… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17868 of 2017

¶2

===========================================================

¶3

Siddharth Shankar Pathak, S/o Late Dr. Rama Kant Pathak, resident of VillageHaripur Ailoth, P.S.- Musri Gharari, District- Samastipur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar, through its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga, through its Registrar.

¶9

The Vice- Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

¶10

The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s

¶12

=============== Appearance :	====	========================================
For the Petitioner/s	:	Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the State	:	Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, G.P. 20
For the L.N.M.U. ===============	: ====	Mr. Jawed Gaffar Khan, Advocate ========================================
CORAM: HONOUR	ABL	E MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶13

Date: 25-06-2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and L.N.

¶15

Mithila University (hereinafter referred to as the ‘University’).

¶16

Second supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the University giving details of the payment made which comes to almost Rs. 35 lakhs.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid, substantial payments having been made, the writ petition stands disposed off.

¶18

However, if it transpires that any amount has remained unpaid, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a representation before the Registrar of the University. If such a representation is filed within four weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed off

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.17868 of 2017 dt.25-06-2018

¶20

2/2

¶21

by a reasoned order. If it transpires that any further amount is required to be paid to the petitioner, the same shall also be paid within four weeks from the date of passing of the order.

¶22

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶23

P. Kumar

¶24

AFR/NAFR U

Siddharth Shankar Pathak v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siddharth Shankar Pathak v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Satish Prasad Singh Vs The B. R. a. Bihar University Through Its Registrar and Ors.

Lalan Prasad Singh Vs The Veer Kunwar Singh University and Ors.

Bodh Narain Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sree Bhadra Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prof. Prabhakar Pathak Vs The Vice Chancellor, L. N. Mithila University, Darbhanga and Ors.

Asharfi Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.