Allowed

Anant Lal Jha v. the Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur Univ

Patna HC22 Nov 2018CWJC/14646/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed a writ petition where the petitioner, while technically classified as a Class-IV employee for absorption, had continuously officiated as a Lab Incharge for over three decades. The Court directed respondents to calculate and pay the salary corresponding to the post of Lab Incharge.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to work out petitioner's entitlement as Lab Incharge and ensure payment within four months of receipt of this order.

Anant Lal Jha Vs the Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur Univ — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14646 of 2009

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Anant Lal Jha, S/O Late Kako Jha, Resident of Sabour (Chhoti Hat), P.S. Sabour, Town & Distt. Bhagalpur

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur through Its Registrar

¶7

The Vice Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

¶8

The Registrar, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

¶9

The Finance Officer Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

¶10

The Principal Sabour College, Sabour, Distt. Bhagalpur

¶11

The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Deptt., Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

¶12

The Director Deptt. Of Higher Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

¶13

The Deputy Director Higher Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purushottam Kr. Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raghwanand, GA-11 Mr. Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, AC to GA-11 For the University : Mr. Shivendra Shankar, Advocate

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT

¶19

Date : 22-11-2018

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the University.

¶21

Mr. Purshottam Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner though appointed on Class-IV post was granted promotion on the post of Laboratory incharge (Geography) by the Managing Committee of the College before the College was made constituent unit of the University in 4^th phase. Referring to Annexure-6 Series (page-23) he submits that this petitioner, who was appointed on 05.03.1981 was promoted to the post of Laboratory incharge (Geography) on 06.11.1985 and he is still continuing on the said post. He submits

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.14646 of 2009 dt.22-11-2018 2/3

¶23

that Annexure-6 was the document filed by the University before the Justice S.C. Agrawal (Retd.) Commission, who was hearing the matter with regard to 4^th phase constituent colleges after the reference by the Apex Court in the case of State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Bihar Rajya M.S.E.S.K.K. Mahasangh & Ors ., reported in (2005) 9 SCC 129 Justice S.C. Agrawal (Retd.) Commission has noted that the petitioner is Class-IV employee for the purpose of absorption and follow up notification was issued by the University i.e. Notification No. 37/2005 treating the petitioner as Class-IV employee, but right from 06.11.1985 till date the petitioner is regularly working as Lab Incharge (Geography) and as such the petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of scale of Lab incharge (Geography). Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the Division Bench judgment dated 15^th May, 2007 passed in Dr. Nitya gopal Bandyopadhyay (L.P.A. No. 517 of 1998) where the Division Bench noticing the continuous service rendered by Dr. Nitya gopal Bandyopadhyay held out that the petitioner is entitled to pay of Principal on account of continuous officiation for such a long period.

¶24

Referring to the aforesaid Division bench judgment, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the present case undisputedly the petitioner has continuously worked for more than

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.14646 of 2009 dt.22-11-2018 3/3

¶26

three decades on the post of Lab. Incharge (Geography) and as such the petitioner is entitled to payment of salary for the post of Lab. Incharge (Geography). He submits that similar view was expressed by the Apex Court in the case of A rindam Chattopadhyay & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and Others , reported in (2013) 4 SCC 152 .

¶27

Considering the fact that the petitioner has worked for more than three decades as Lab incharge (Geography), the petitioner cannot be denied his minimum salary admissible to the post of Lab. Incharge. The respondents are accordingly directed to work out the entitlement of the petitioner as Lab Incharge and ensure payment thereof preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands allowed and disposed of.

¶29

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶30

uday/-

¶31

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	30.11.2018
Transmission Date

Anant Lal Jha v. the Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur Univ

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anant Lal Jha v. the Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur Univ

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abrar Ahmad @ Ibrar Ahmad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Wajahul Quamar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Surya Deo Prasad Sinha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Rajendra Prasad Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Arvind Kumar and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Raja Ram Rajkar and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.