Dismissed

Abrar Ahmad @ Ibrar Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC20 Nov 2018CWJC/22925/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitioner sought appointment as teacher; rival contestant joined another block eliminating conflict. Court directed District Programme Officer to inquire and examine petitioner's case sympathetically in light of interim stay before passing order.

What did the court decide?

Directive to District Programme Officer to inquire into the matter and examine petitioner's case sympathetically and pass appropriate order.

Abrar Ahmad @ Ibrar Ahmad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22925 of 2012

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Abrar Ahmad @ Ibrar Ahmad S/O Anwar Ahmad R/O Village- Panwari Mathiya, P.S.- Sikarahatta, District- Bhojpur Ara

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Director, Primary Education, Patna

¶8

The District Education Officer, Bhojpur, Ara

¶9

The District Superintendent Of Education, Bhojpur, Ara

¶10

Block Development Officer, Block-Tarari, District- Bhojpur, Ara

¶11

Block Education Extension Officer Tarari Block, District- Bhojpur, Ara

¶12

The Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal Ara, Bhojpur

¶13

Gram Panchayat Panwari Through Mukhiya Panwari Gram Panchayat, P.S.Tarari, District- Bhojpur, Ara

¶14

Panchayat Secretary Panwari Gram Panchayat, Block- Tarari, DistrictBhojpur, Ara

¶15

Md. Alimuddin S/O Md. Wakil R/O Village- Sikarahatta Khurd, P.S.Sikarahatta, District- Bhojpur, Ara

¶16

... ... Respondent/s

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance :

¶19

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiva Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Bhagat, AC to AAG-12 ======================================================

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶21

6 20-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of the Tribunal has lost significance in view of the fact that respondent no.10 Md. Alimuddin has joined as teacher in another block and he is no more a contestant in the present writ application. There is no conflict of interest then there is no opposition to the appointment of this petitioner. If this is the factual position, then the petitioner would be at liberty to agitate

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.22925 of 2012(6) dt.20-11-2018 2/2

¶24

the matter before the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Bhojpur at Ara who shall enquire into the matter and if it is found that there is no claimant including the respondent no.10 against the appointment of the petitioner, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Bhojpur at Ara shall examine the case of the petitioner sympathetically and pass appropriate order considering the case of the petitioner particularly in view of the fact that by virtue of interim stay, the petitioner is still continuing.

¶25

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶26

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶27

Ravi/-

¶28

Abrar Ahmad @ Ibrar Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abrar Ahmad @ Ibrar Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Kumar Paswan Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Akhileshwar Prasad Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prem Nath Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Wajahul Quamar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Surya Deo Prasad Sinha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Smt. Prema Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.