Disposed

Smt. Usha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC14 Dec 2018CWJC/13871/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition alleged non-payment of an authorized provident fund claim. The State responded that the sanctioned amount had already been credited to the petitioner's account. The court disposed of the writ application on the basis that the claim was satisfied. No substantive issues were enumerated in this order.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of as the petitioner's claim regarding the provident fund had already been satisfied by the State.

Smt. Usha Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13871 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Smt. Usha Kumari, W/o Dr. Umesh Prasad Chaudhary, R/o Adarsh Nagar, Majhaulia, Khabra Lane No. 03, Post- Khabra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur, Pin842001.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna- 1.

¶7

The Director, Secondary Education, Department of Education, Ground Floor, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan Patna- 800001.

¶8

The District Education Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶9

The District Programme Officer, Dept. of Education, Hajipur, Vaishali.

¶10

The District Provident Fund Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur.

¶11

The Block Education Officer-cum-Drawing and Disbursement Officer, Patedhi Belsari, Dist.- Vaishali.

¶12

The Headmaster, Rajkiya Utkramit Madhya Vidyalaya, Chak Maruf, Patedhi Belsar, Vaishali.

¶13

The Treasury Officer, Lalganj, Vaishali.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt. Shilpa Singh - Ga12 ======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶19

3 14-12-2018

¶20

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶21

The petitioner has prayed for payment of Provident Fund which has been authorized by the GPF office, District, Hajipur on 24.01.2018 but the same has not been paid.

¶22

Counsel for the State submits that the GPF amount has already been sanctioned and a bill was submitted by the District Provident Fund Office, Vaishali and a sum of Rs.8,06442/- has already been sent to the Treasury Officer on

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.13871 of 2018(3) dt.14-12-2018 2/2

¶24

28.03.2018 and credited in the account of the petitioner.

¶25

Considering the said averments, the claim of the petitioner having been satisfied, this writ application is disposed of accordingly.

¶26

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶27

sanjeev/-

¶28

Smt. Usha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Usha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrinal Kanti Nandi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Saket Suman Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rambha Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nand Kishore Pandit Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shahnaz Bano Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.