The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding a bridge issue, declining to interfere and directing the petitioner to approach the State Government or the Chief Vigilance Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11554 of 2018
======================================================
Rabindra Kumar Karn @ Ravindra Pd. Lal, son of Late Ramsewak Lal, resident of Mohalla- Jyotipuram Colony, P.S. Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate For Pul Nigam : Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate Ms. Binita Singh, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 25-06-2018 With regard to the bridge in question we are not
Patna High Court CWJC No.11554 of 2018(2) dt.25-06-2018 2/2
inclined to interfere into the matter. Petitioner may take up the issue with the authorities of the State Government or the Chief Vigilance Authority who are competent enough to deal with the issue in question.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed
of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
P.K.P./-
U
Rabindra Kumar Karn @ Ravindra Pd. Lal
The State of Bihar
The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar
The Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Limited
The Union of India
Rajendra Menon
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
