Allowed

Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC20 Jun 2018CWJC/10873/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna allowed the writ petition and directed the release of the petitioner's seized vehicle within one week upon furnishing two sureties, cautioning respondents against initiating confiscation proceedings contrary to statutory provisions.

What did the court decide?

Release of secular vehicle Splendor ProMotorcycle within one week upon furnishing two sureties; liberty to seek compensation in case of wrongful confiscation proceedings.

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Motor Accident Claims | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10873 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Jitendra Kumar, son of Manejar Prasad, resident of village- Tikampar, P.S. Bhatpar Rani, District- Deoria (U.P.)

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Patna, Bihar

¶7

The District Magistrate, Siwan

¶8

The Superintendent of Police, Siwan

¶9

The Officer-in-Charge, Guthni, Police Station, Siwan

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad- GP 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶12

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶13

2 20-06-2018 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we direct that pending finalization of the criminal case ( Guthni P.S. Case No.71 of 2018), vehicle of the petitioner (Splendor ProMotorcycle) be released to the petitioner on the petitioner furnishing two sureties to the satisfaction of District Magistratecum-Collector, Siwan.

¶14

In case the respondents want to take action for confiscation, they are cautioned to take note of Section 56 of the Act and shall initiate proceedings only if the confiscation proceedings can be initiated in a case like this where there is no seizure of liquor and the vehicle is not used for transportation of

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.10873 of 2018(2) dt.20-06-2018 2/2

¶16

liquor and only the driver is found to have driven the vehicle in a drunken condition. In case confiscation proceedings are initiated and finally it is found that the confiscation could not be initiated being contrary to Section 56, the petitioner shall have liberty to seek compensation to be paid by the officer concerned personally who takes action in the matter.

¶17

The vehicle in question be released within one week from the date of furnishing the sureties.

¶18

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

¶19

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶20

( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶21

K.C.Jha/-

¶22

Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arjun Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chandra Bhushan Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Deepak Kumar Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rahul Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Santosh Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Bihar, Prohibition And Excise Department, Gove