Allowed

Santosh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Bihar, Prohibition And Excise Department, Gove

Patna HC20 Jun 2018CR. WJC/1475/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted leave to provisionally release a truck seized for carrying illicit liquor. The petitioner must furnish a surety bond, provide ownership documents for the vehicle and cargo, and accept a certified photograph of the seized items.

What did the court decide?

Vehicle released provisionally against a surety bond of Rs. 10,10,000/- and execution of necessary undertakings and panchnama.

Santosh Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar, Through… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1475 of 2018 Arising out of Giriyak P.S. Case No.130 of 2018, District-Nalanda

¶2

====================================================== Santosh Prasad, S/o Kedar Sundi, R/o Ward No. 7, Bagdo, Post- Bagdo, P.S.- Koderma, District - Koderma, Jharkhand.

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶4

The State of Bihar, Through the Principal Secretary, Bihar, Prohibition And Excise Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶5

The Collector, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

¶6

The Superintendent of Police, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

¶7

The Superintendent of Excise, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

¶8

The Officer In Charge , Giriyak P.S., District- Nalanda.

¶9

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad (GP-7)

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 20-06-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the truck in question has been seized in connection with recovery of two bottles of officer choice green whisky containing 750 ml each. Vehicle is lying under open sky for about one and half month and presently no confiscation proceeding has been initiated. Learned counsel submits that the truck was loaded with stone-chips with legal and valid documents in respect thereof. However, it has been seized in connection with a case registered under the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶12

In the given facts and circumstances, pending initiation or finalization of the confiscation proceeding, let the

¶13

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1475 of 2018 (2) dt.20-06-2018

¶14

¶15

vehicle (truck) of the petitioner bearing Reg.No.JH-02J-3105, Engine No.70E62570061, Chassis No.426031ESZ213926, which has been seized in connection with Giriyak P.S. Case No.130 of 2018, loaded with stone-chips be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on his showing document of ownership of the vehicle and other legal and valid documents with regard to the stone-chips within a period of one week, subject to the following conditions:-

¶16

(i) Petitioner shall furnish surety bond of Rs.10,00,000/- (ten lakhs) (not in form of bank guarantee or cash) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif/authority concerned.

¶17

(ii) The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that he will not deal with the vehicle in question and shall not alienate or encumber the same creating any kind of adverse interest against the interest of the State, he will not use the vehicle for any illegal purpose and as and when required, he will produce the vehicle in question before the competent court/authority.

¶18

(iii) At the time of release, the concerned

¶19

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1475 of 2018 (2) dt.20-06-2018

¶20

¶21

authority/court shall get prepared a photograph duly certified in presence of the petitioner and panchnama of the vehicle in question shall also be prepared and keep the same on record which may be used as secondary evidence.

¶22

(iv) Petitioner shall undertake not to challenge the said photograph and panchnama so prepared in his presence at the time of release of vehicle in question for use in course of trial or the confiscation proceeding, as the case may be.

¶23

The application stands disposed of.

¶24

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶25

Arvind/-

¶26

U T

Santosh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Bihar, Prohibition And Excise Department, Gove

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Bihar, Prohibition And Excise Department, Gove

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arjun Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chandra Bhushan Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Deepak Kumar Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rahul Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.