Dismissed

Prof. Om Prakash Gupta v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC19 Nov 2018CWJC/9053/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner claimed discrepancy in payment regarding Ph.D. increment. Court disposed writ petition granting liberty for petitioner to represent to University Registrar for verification and order within two weeks, directing further payment if verified.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to represent before Registrar to remedy discrepancy in Ph.D. increment dues; direction to pass reasoned order within two weeks and pay within three weeks if due.

Prof. Om Prakash Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9053 of 2017

¶2

===========================================================

¶3

Prof. Om Prakash Gupta, Son of Late Mishri Lal Sah, R/o Mohalla- Katahari Bagh Karim Chak, P.O.- Chapra, P.S.- Chapra Town, District- Saran, Pin- 841301.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar, through the Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur through its Registrar.

¶8

The Vice Chancellor, BRA Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

¶9

The Jai Prakash University, Chapra through its Registrar.

¶10

The Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra.

¶11

The Principal, P.C. Vigyan Mahavidyalaya Katahari Bagh Road, Chapra.

¶12

.... .... Respondent/s

¶13

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶14

Date: 19-11-2018

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State; Magadh

¶16

University and J.P. University.

¶17

It is agreed at the Bar that all admitted dues of the petitioner have been paid.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is a slight discrepancy inasmuch as Ph.D. increment has not been added while computing the dues of the petitioner for which he may be given liberty to represent before the Registrar of the University.

¶19

In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.

¶20

If such a representation is filed within three weeks

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.9053 of 2017 dt.19-11-2018

¶22

2/2

¶23

from today, before the Registrar of the University, he shall look into the matter and upon verification from the records shall pass a reasoned order within two weeks from the date of filing of the representation. If any further payment is required to be made to the petitioner, in terms of the order to be passed, the same shall also be paid to him within the next three weeks.

¶24

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶25

P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U

Prof. Om Prakash Gupta v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prof. Om Prakash Gupta v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Shankar Prasad Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Madhubala Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shyamanand Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pramod Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Balram Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kalendra Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.