Disposed

Rajendra Prasad Singh Retd. Panchayat Sewak v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC10 Dec 2018CWJC/10664/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a retired Panchayat Secretary, seeks pension difference due to revision under 2nd ACP. Court disposes of writ application by granting liberty to file a fresh representation to the Collector, to be disposed of within three months with subsequent payment if admissible.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file fresh representation before Respondent No. 3; disposal within three months; payment of admissible dues within one month.

Rajendra Prasad Singh Retd. Panchayat Sewak Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10664 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Rajendra Prasad Singh ( Retd. Panchayat Sewak ), Son of late Ram Bilash Singh, Resident of Village & P.O. Nadiyawan, P.S.- Ramgardh Chouk, District- Lakhisarai.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Accountant General Bihar, Veer Chand Patel Marge, Patna.

¶8

The Collector, Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai.

¶9

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Lakhisarai.

¶10

The Block Development Officer, Surajgardha District- Lakhisarai.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar-Aag4 For the Accountant General Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, Advocate ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 10-12-2018

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel on behalf of the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General.

¶16

The petitioner retired from the post of Panchayat Secretary w.e.f. 28-02-2014 from Surajgardha Block, DistrictLakhisarai.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks payment of difference on account of revision in pursuance to the benefit to the 2^nd ACP granted to him w.e.f. 02.07.2010 and pension be paid accordingly.

¶18

Considering the nature of relief claimed by the

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.10664 of 2018(2) dt.10-12-2018 2/2

¶20

petitioner, this writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent No. 3, The Collector, Lakhisarai which will be disposed of within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation by a speaking order communicated to the petitioner by registered post. If any dues and interest is found admissible, the same shall be paid within one month thereafter.

¶21

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶22

sudha/-

¶23

Rajendra Prasad Singh Retd. Panchayat Sewak v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Prasad Singh Retd. Panchayat Sewak v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aftab Alam Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Arjun Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Surendra Prasad Ram and Anr. Vs Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Through Its Managing Director and Anr.

Krishna Ballabh Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ishwari Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Pravesh Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.