Dismissed

Kaushal Kaushik v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Patna HC9 May 2018CR. WJC/955/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner withdrew the criminal writ application with liberty to raise issues post-investigation and prosecute the matter. The writ is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner retained liberty to participate in the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Writ application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise points after investigation if charge sheet is filed.

Kaushal Kaushik Vs The State Of Bihar Through The… — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.955 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kaushal Kaushik, Son of Late Jagdish Prasad, Resident of VillageNisarpura, P.O. Amarpura, P.S.Naubatpur, District-Patna, Presently Chief Councilor, Nagar Panchayat Naubatpur, P.O. and P.S. Naubatpur, DistrictPatna.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Through The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Patna District-Patna.

¶9

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna,

¶10

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Danapur, District-Patna.

¶11

The Block Development Officer-Cum-Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Naubatpur, District-Patna.

¶12

The Station Head Officer, Naubatpur, District-Patna.

¶13

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kinkar Kumar, SC-9 Mr. Sushant Praveer, AC to SC-9 Mr. Yogesh Kumar, AC to SC-9

¶14

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶15

5 09-05-2018 As the Court was going to dictate the judgment, at

¶16

the outset, learned counsel Mr. S.B.K. Manglam representing the petitioner prays to withdraw the writ application with liberty to raise all such points which are available to him after completion of investigation if a charge sheet is filed against the petitioner.

¶17

Learned counsel for the State is present.

¶18

The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with

¶19

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.955 of 2018 (5) dt.09-05-2018

¶20

2/2

¶21

liberty aforesaid.

¶22

The petitioner will have liberty to participate in the

¶23

investigation and co-operate in accordance with the law.

¶24

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶25

N.H./-

¶26

U T

Kaushal Kaushik v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaushal Kaushik v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Sikandar Alam @ Md. Sikendar Alam Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Excise Government Of Bihar, Patna

Prabhas Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Excise, Government Of Bihar, Patn

Raja Ram Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar Through Home Secretary Patna Bihar and Ors.

Ganesh Patel and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar, Through Its Chief Secretary, Bihar Patna and Ors.

Perwez Alam Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Director General Cum Inspector General Of Police, Patna and Ors.

Vijay Kumar Singh @ Vijay Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.