Disposed

Prabhas Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Excise, Government Of Bihar, Patn

Patna HC8 May 2018CR. WJC/1173/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order allowing provisional release of petitioner's motorcycle subject to furnishing sureties and undertakings, with direction to authority to consider initiation of confiscation under Section 56 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 before proceeding.

What did the court decide?

Provisional release of motorcycle bearing registration no. BR-43M-0676

Prabhas Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1173 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-604 Year-2017 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Saharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prabhas Kumar S/o Vakil Yadav, R/o Vill.- Gamhariya, P.S.- Saur Bazar, District- Saharsa.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, District- Saharsa.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, District- Saharsa.

¶10

The S.H.O. of Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha (Ga1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 08-05-2018

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶15

learned counsel representing the State.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not pray for any other relief save and except the prayer for release of the motorcycle in question.

¶17

In this view of the matter, the prayer for quashing of the first information report and challenge to the initiation of confiscation proceeding are not pressed. It is stated that petitioner was driving the vehicle in a drunken condition and no illicit liquor has been recovered from the vehicle in question. The confiscation proceeding is still pending with the District Magistrate, Madhepura. Learned counsel submits that the

¶18

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1173 of 2018(2) dt.08-05-2018 2/3

¶19

petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the terms and conditions which may be imposed by this Court for provisional release of the motorcycle.

¶20

Learned counsel for the State is present.

¶21

Considering the submissions, made on behalf of the petitioner, and finding that the petitioner is seeking only provisional release of the motorcycle during pendency of the confiscation proceeding, this Court directs provisional release of motorcycle, bearing registration no. BR-43M-0676 on the petitioner’s producing the document of ownership and registration in his favour along with two sureties (not in form of cash or bank guarantee) to the extent of value of Rs.60,000/(rupees sixty thousand) to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Madhepura. The provisional release will be subject to the condition that the petitioner shall not transfer his vehicle in question in favour of any third party creating any adverse interest to the interest of the State and as and when required he will produce the vehicle in question before the authority concerned. Before release of the vehicle a Panchanama shall also be prepared which will be certified and kept on record. The petitioner undertakes not to challenge secondary evidence.

¶22

This application stands disposed off accordingly.

¶23

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1173 of 2018(2) dt.08-05-2018 3/3

¶24

It is made clear that before initiation of any confiscation proceeding the District Magistrate shall consider the preliminary issue as to whether in view of Section 56 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, a confiscation proceeding may be initiated in respect of a vehicle from which there is no recovery of illicit liquor.

¶25

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶26

Shamshad/-

¶27

Prabhas Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Excise, Government Of Bihar, Patn

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhas Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Excise, Government Of Bihar, Patn

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Excise, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna and

Damodar Prasad Gupta @ Damodar Prasad @ Damodar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar, Through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Sanjay Saw Vs The State Of Bihar Through Collector, Patna and Anr.

Md. Sikandar Alam @ Md. Sikendar Alam Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Excise Government Of Bihar, Patna

Raja Ram Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar Through Home Secretary Patna Bihar and Ors.

Md. Salim and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.