In this criminal writ jurisdiction case, the petitioner failed to appear to press the application. The learned counsel for the State noted facts from the application regarding a college closure in a Kotwali case. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ application due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1036 of 2016
====================================================== Munni Lal Rai Son of Bijuli Rai, Village- Chitaha, P.O.- Bamaharibrit, P.S.- Banjaria, District- East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md.Nadim Seraj(GP-5)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the State is present and submits that prima facie it appears from the facts narrated in the writ application itself that the premise of the college in question has been locked in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.270 of 2016.
Taking note of the facts and circumstances as appearing from the writ application and that nobody is appearing to press this writ application, the writ application is dismissed.
Arvind/-
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
U T
Munni Lal Rai
State of Bihar
Director General of Police Govt. of Bihar Patna
Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna
Additional Superintendent of Police, STF, Patna
Superintendent of Police, Vaishali at Hajipur
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
