Petitioner moved a writ application regarding a distress warrant. Upon hearing, the Court observed that the petitioner had already paid the required amount, rendering the application infructuous. The writ was disposed off accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1022 of 2016
======================================================
Sanoj Kumar, son of Sukhlal Singh, Resident of Village - Badaswa, P.S. - Arrah, Mufassil, District - Bhojpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad (SC-8)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 14-08-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court that the petitioner has already paid Rs.62,000/- for realization of which the distress warrant in question was issued by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur, Ara in Misc. Case No.141 of 2008.
Learned counsel for the State submits that it is his instruction that at present no distress warrant is pending for execution.
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1022 of 2016 (2) dt.14-08-2018
2
In view of the statements made on behalf of the petitioner, this writ application has become infructuous. It is disposed off accordingly.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Arvind/-
U T
Sanoj Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
