Dismissed

Naim Ansari @ Naim v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Dec 2018CR. MISC./75596/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order refusing anticipatory bail to a petitioner in an excise case. The petitioner fled during a chase, and the liquor was recovered from the spot. The court held there was no enmity to support the disclosure of the petitioner's name. Care was advised to surrender for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected. Petitioner advised to surrender for regular bail.

Naim Ansari @ Naim Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.75596 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Naim Ansari @ Naim, Son of Jalaluddin Ansari, Resident of VillageBarharwa, P.S. Kundwa Chainpur, Distt. East Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 21-12-2018 Heard both sides.

¶9

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Excise Case No.379 of 2018, registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶10

The informant alleged that he stopped two persons carrying Nepali liquor on cycle. On chase, Samimu was apprehended and petitioner managed to flee away. Samimu disclosed the name of the petitioner.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of enmity the apprehended accused disclosed the name of the petitioner but there is nothing on record to show that the petitioner has got any enmity with the apprehended accused. The petitioner and the apprehended accused pere carrying

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75596 of 2018(2) dt.21-12-2018 2/2

¶13

Nepali liquor inside the Indian territory but on chase petitioner managed to flee away and liquor was recovered from the spot.

¶14

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

¶15

If the petitioner surrenders in the court below, the court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

¶16

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶17

S.KUMAR/-

¶18

U T

Naim Ansari @ Naim v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naim Ansari @ Naim v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Goutam Kumar Manjhi @ Goutam Manjhi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Indu Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Shabanam and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shiv Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shams Tabrez Vs The State Of Bihar

Kundan Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar