Allowed

Md. Afzal v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Dec 2018CR. MISC./75043/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the petitioner, who is in custody, for an offence of theft under Sections 379/34 IPC. The court ordered release upon furnishing a bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including local bailors, court appearance, and non-tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail in PS Case No.215 of 2018 upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, subject to specified conditions regarding bailors, court attendance, and conduct.

Md. Afzal Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.75043 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2018 Thana- BISFI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Afzal Son of Md. Wajid Resident of Village- usauthudih, P.S. Bisfi, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 14-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

counsel for the State.

¶12

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 215 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379,34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Informant has alleged in his written complaint that on 13.08.2018 he parked his Bolero Vehicle at his Dalan. About 4:00 AM when he woke up for urine, he found that his vehicle was missing. After much search he could not found vehicle, in the meantime wife of the informant had gone for a morning walk, she saw the petitioner and others were going on the said vehicle towards Dudhail village.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75043 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2

¶16

previous enmity between the parties. Petitioner is in custody since 30.09.2018.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Benipatti, Madhubani, in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 215 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

¶18

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

¶19

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

¶20

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶21

(S. Kumar, J)

¶22

veena/-

¶23

U T

Md. Afzal v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Afzal v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Riyajul @ Md. Reyajun Vs The State Of Bihar

Sivan Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Alamgir and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Roushan Nek @ Ladan @ Raushan Vs The State Of Bihar

Keshav Singh @ Raju @ Raju Singh @ Keshav Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Hiran Yadav @ Haran Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar