Allowed

Arbind Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Dec 2018CR. MISC./69762/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to Arbind Sahni, accused of possession of a pistol under the IPC and Arms Act, upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to standard co-operation and non-tampering conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions of local sureties, co-operation, and non-tampering.

Arbind Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.69762 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2017 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arbind Sahni Son of Shivji Sahni Resident of Village-Sahatha,Ward No.2 P.S. Bhgawanpur, Distt.-Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Niranjan Parihar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Brajendra Nath Pandey ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 07-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶11

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 166 of 2017 (G.R. No. 2541 of 2018) registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414, 399, 402, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1b)a, 26, 35 of Arms Act.

¶12

Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of one country made pistol with loaded cartridges from his possession.

¶13

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to police atrocities. Charge sheet has been submitted. Petitioner is in custody since 14.09.2017.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69762 of 2018(3) dt.07-12-2018 2/2

¶16

the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-III, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 166 of 2017 (G.R. No. 2541 of 2018) subject to the conditions that:-

¶17

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

¶18

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

¶19

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶20

(S. Kumar, J)

¶21

veena/-

¶22

U T

Arbind Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Praveen Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Golu Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Kamlesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Karu Singh @ Karka Singh @ Vicky Singh @ Brajesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Uttam Kumar Ram @ Sadhu Ram @ Uttam Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Uday Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar