Allowed

Golu Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Dec 2018CR. MISC./69731/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous matter wherein the High Court of Judicature at Patna, through a bench of Justice S. Kumar, granted bail to the petitioner Golu Choudhary accused in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 302, 341, 323 IPC, requiring a bail bond and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Golu Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.69731 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1900 Year-2017 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas

¶3

====================================================== Golu Choudhary, Son of Raj Kumar Choudhary, Resident of MuhallaKhirkighat, P.S.- Sasaram Town, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinay Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shantanu Kumar (APP) ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 06-12-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned counsel

¶13

for the informant as well as learned counsel for the State.

¶14

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection

¶15

with S.Tr. No. 387 of 2018 arising out of Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 1900 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶16

Informant has alleged that on the date of occurrence in the morning he was going to see his field and was returning two F.I.R. named accused Nanhak Choudhary and Vikash Choudhary and one unknown assaulted his father by fire arm and bit-bricks as a result of which he fell down and subsequently died.

¶17

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case during investigation. He is not named in FIR and he is in custody since 06.04.2018.

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69731 of 2018(2) dt.06-12-2018 2/2

¶19

Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 4^th Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with S. Tr. No. 387 of 2018 arising out of Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 1900 of 2017, subject to conditions:

¶20

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

¶21

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶22

(S. Kumar, J)

¶23

Rajiv/Manoj

¶24

U T

Golu Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Golu Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Kishun Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Purushottam Kumar @ Purushottam Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Praveen Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kamlesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudhir Mahto @ Sudhir Kumar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar