Allowed

Sunil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Dec 2018CR. MISC./68940/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking bail for offences under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act related to alleged dowry harassment and assault, the High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner subject to furnishing money and sureties and strict compliance with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Sunil Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.68940 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2018 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sunil Paswan Son of Shambhu Paswan, Resident of Village-Chintamanpur, Police Station-Govindganj (Malahi), District-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 04-12-2018

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶11

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Govindganj (Malahi) P.S. Case No. 140 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 3147, 323, 313, 498(A), 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶12

Allegation against petitioner is of assaulting and torturing the informant for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶13

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is the husband of informant and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been further submitted that informant wants to reside separately from her in laws because of

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68940 of 2018(2) dt.04-12-2018 2/2

¶15

which she lodged the present case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 21.06.2018.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1^st , East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Govindganj (Malahi) P.S. Case No. 140 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

¶17

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

¶18

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

¶19

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶20

(S. Kumar, J)

¶21

veena/-

¶22

U T

Sunil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Tarique Vs The State Of Bihar

Bikash Kumar @ Golu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vidyavati Kuar Vs The State Of Bihar

Pinki Kumari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar