Allowed

Vidyavati Kuar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Dec 2018CR. MISC./68898/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the Patna High Court granted bail to Vidyavati Kuar, who was in custody awaiting trial for rape allegations under Sections 304(B) and 120(B) IPC. The petitioner was to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties before the A.C.J.M.-VII, Gopalganj.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-VII, Gopalganj.

Vidyavati Kuar Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.68898 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2017 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vidyavati Kuar, Wife of Surendar Kuar, Resident of Village- Mairwa Karan, Police Station- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar – 1 (APP) ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-12-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned

¶13

counsel for the State.

¶14

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 69 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Informant who is father of deceased has stated in his written complaint that his deceased daughter was married on 22.04.2016 and sufficient presents were given to them at the time of marriage but after marriage she was being tortured for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and petitioner went to Punjab to earn his livelihood but his family members tortured her and petitioner also threatened her. On 14.03.2017 couple was blessed with a daughter. On 29.03.2017 he came to know

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68898 of 2018(2) dt.04-12-2018 2/2

¶17

that his daughter is dead and he reached there on 30.03.2017 and she was cremated in her presence and on 01.04.2017 the present case was registered.

¶18

It has been submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is an old mother-in-law. At the time of occurrence she was not present at the place of occurrence and allegation against him is false and concocted. Victim was suffering with mental disease for which she committed suicide which is apparent from the postmortem report as doctor has opined that cause of death due to asphyxia due to hanging. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 27.07.2018.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VII, Gopalganj, in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 69 of 2017.

¶20

(S. Kumar, J)

¶21

Rajiv/Manoj

¶22

U T

Vidyavati Kuar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vidyavati Kuar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Tarique Vs The State Of Bihar

Bikash Kumar @ Golu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Pinki Kumari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar