Allowed

Vikas Kumar Maurya v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC3 Dec 2018CR. MISC./67387/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an anticipatory bail petition. The petitioner, accused of robbery and illegal possession of arms, was found to have no criminal antecedents. Bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds and appearing within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed with bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- and two sureties; petitioner to appear within four weeks.

Vikas Kumar Maurya Vs The State Of Bihar — Arbitration | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.67387 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2018 Thana- RAJPUR District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vikas Kumar Maurya, S/o Siphahi Singh, R/o Vill-Kharahana, P.S. Itarhi Distt.-Buxar, At Present R/o Vill-Tiyara, P.S. Rajpur Distt-Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 03-12-2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶15

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rajpuir P.S. Case No. 180 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 and 41 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶17

The first information report reflects that petitioner runs Hariyana Auto Parts and Service Centre and further more the first information report reflects that some parts of stolen motorcycle were recovered from the shop of the petitioner but there is nothing in the first information report to show that the petitioner was aware about this fact that co-accused was handing over him the parts of looted motorcycle. Moreover, the

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67387 of 2018(2) dt.03-12-2018 2/2

¶19

petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as

¶21

well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioner, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the court concerned, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Rajpur P.S. Case No. 180 of 2018 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶23

Spd/-

¶24

U T

Vikas Kumar Maurya v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Kumar Maurya v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ayodhya Prasad @ Pappu Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sushil Pathak Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Higher Education and Ors.

Shakuntala Devi Vs The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary Bihar, Patna Namely Anjani Kumar Singh and Ors.

Vijay Sah @ Vijay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Anup Kumar Srivasatava Vs The State Of Bihar

Bijli Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar