Dismissed

Sushil Pathak v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Higher Education and Ors.

Patna HC28 Nov 2018MJC/2708/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition regarding dues, noting the Registrar's submission that the amount had been transferred to the petitioner's account. The court allowed a fresh petition if dissatisfied with the calculation.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; liberty granted to file fresh petition if dissatisfied with calculation.

Sushil Pathak Vs The State Of Bihar Through… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2708 of 2016 In

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19077 of 2013

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sushil Pathak, retired Librarian, C.M. Science College, Darbhanga, son of Late P.L. Pathak, resident of village-Naruar, P.S. Bhairab Asthan, District Madhubani.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through Sri A. Kumar, the Secretary Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

Sri S. Kushwha, Vice-Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

¶9

Sri A. Singh, Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga.

¶10

Sri V.K. Singh, Finance Officer, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga.

¶11

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

6 28-11-2018

¶14

Show cause is filed on behlaf of Registrar, L.N.Mithila University, Darbhanga. Let it be kept on record.

¶15

The Registrar and Vice-Chancellor of L.N.Mithila University, Darbhanga are present in person. Delay in filing the show cause is accepted and personal appearance of Registrar and Vice-Chancellor of concerned University stands dispensed with.

¶16

Para 4 of the show cause goes to show that University has already sent admitted dues amount to the Bank for transferring the said amount into the account of the petitoner and, therefore, it appears that order of this court has already

¶17

Patna High Court MJC No.2708 of 2016(6) dt.28-11-2018 2/2

¶18

been complied with.

¶19

In the aforesaid circumstance, this petiton stands dismissed. However, it is made clear that petitoner shall be at liberty to file fresh writ petition, if he is not satisfied with the calculation made by the concerned University.

¶20

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶21

shahzad/-

¶22

Sushil Pathak v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Higher Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Pathak v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Higher Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramanand Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Kanhaiya Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sangita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ayodhya Prasad @ Pappu Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shakuntala Devi Vs The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary Bihar, Patna Namely Anjani Kumar Singh and Ors.

Usha Devi Vs The National Highway, Authority Of India and Ors.