Oral order in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. Petitioner counsel submitted charge was framed, render petition infructuous. Court dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6610 of 2016 (2) dt.11-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6610 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -174 Year- 2013 Thana -SONBERSA District- SAHARSA
VERSUS
.... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Haque (App)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 11-10-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that charge had already been framed whereupon instant petition has become infructuous, on account thereof, dismissed.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan
U T
GAUTAM KUMAR SAH
CHIKU KUMAR SAH
ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
