Allowed

Ambika Thakur and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC14 Dec 2018CR. MISC./64653/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an anticipatory bail petition. The court observed discrepancies in the FIR regarding an attempt to outrage modesty, noting the complainant's statement did not mention it and the wife was not examined. The petitioners were granted bail upon arrest with specified conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; release on bail bonds of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties upon arrest/surrender.

Ambika Thakur and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.64653 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-508 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ambika Thakur, Son of Jobraj Thakur,

¶5

Ranjan Thakur, Son of Bhola Thakur, Both are residents of Village- Badildih, Police Station- Khaira, District- Jamui.

¶6

... ... Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar.

¶9

Yogendra Thakur, Son of Kashi Thakur, Resident of Village- Badildih, Police Station- Khaira, District- Jamui.

¶10

... ... Opposite Parties

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 14-12-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as

¶14

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 508 C of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 354-B, 380, 451/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Petitioners and other accused having entered into the house of the complainant assaulted him and petitioners made attempt to outrage the modesty of complainant’s wife but when the S.A. of complainant was recorded, the complainant nowhere stated that petitioners made attempt to outrage the modesty of his wife. Moreover, the wife of the complainant was not

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64653 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2

¶18

examined in course of enquiry.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners points out that prior to filing of the present complaint case, petitioner no. 1 filed Complaint Case No. 444 C of 2018 against the complainant of this case and in retaliation to the aforesaid complaint case, the complainant has brought the present complaint case.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioners, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the court concerned, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri M.K. Pandey, learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Jamui in Complaint Case No. 508 C of 2018, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶22

shahzad/-

Ambika Thakur and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ambika Thakur and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanaullah Khan Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance, Bihar, Patna

Binod Chaudhary @ Manoj Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Narendra Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Gayatri Kumari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Arun Kumar Sinha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Pintu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar