Allowed

Shambhu Mahto @ Pasi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Feb 2018CR. MISC./63735/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Shambhu Mahto, apprehending arrest in P.S. Case No. 99 of 2017 under the Arms Act. Bail is conditional on surrender within six weeks and furnishing a security bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to surrender within six weeks and furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Shambhu Mahto @ Pasi Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.63735 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -99 Year- 2017 Thana -BACHWARA District- BEGUSARAI

¶3

====================================================== Shambhu Mahto @ Pasi, son fo Sitaram Mahto, resident of village Bajitpur, P.S. Vidyapati Nagar, Distt. Samastipur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ataur Rahman, A.P.P.

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 06-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bachhawara

¶13

P.S. Case No. 99 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-b) a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶14

It is alleged that police apprehended two persons on the Bolero vehicle. The apprehended persons disclosed their names as Kanhaiya Lal Sharma and Shyam Nandan Paswan. Kanhaiya Lal Sharma disclosed himself as driver of the Bolero vehicle. Police searched the said Bolero vehicle and recovered one double barrel gun and 20 live cartridges kept in a plastic bag. One of the apprehended persons namely, Kanhaiya Lal Sharma disclosed the name of this petitioner of having fled away from the place of occurrence.

¶15

As such, there is no recovery of any incriminating article from possession of this petitioner.

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63735 of 2017 (4) dt.06-02-2018

¶17

2/2

¶18

It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Bachhawara P.S. Case No. 99 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

¶20

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶21

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶22

S.Ali/U T

Shambhu Mahto @ Pasi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shambhu Mahto @ Pasi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahaveer Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bihari Bhagat Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Nitesh Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Santosh Kumar Jaiswal Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jay Kishore Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Vyasanand @ Shambhunath Pathak and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar