Petitioner applied under Section 227 Cr. P.C. against an order rejecting their petition. Court held application infructuous as charge was framed and witness examined, dismissing the application.
Petitioner's application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13734 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -273 Year- 2012 Thana -SHASTRINAGAR District- PATNA
======================================================
Nitesh Kumar, son of Sri Naag Narayan Ram, resident of village Ashok Nagar, P.S. Jalalpur, Distt. Chapra (Bihar) at present Mohalla Kailashpuri, Ward No. 06,Tilaiyabasti, P.S.Tilaiya,Distt. Kodarma (Jharkhand).
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Fahimuddin (App)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER
2 05-02-2018 The petitioner has filed the instant application against the order dated 10.12.2014 by which the learned Magistrate has rejected the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 227 Cr. P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
charge has been framed and one witness has been examined in the case.
In such circumstances, this application has become
infructuous.
The application is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
S.Ali/U T
Nitesh Kumar
The State of Bihar
Lal Babu Sah
Sanjay Priya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
