Allowed

Nathuni Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Dec 2018CR. MISC./63696/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court granted provisional bail to petitioner who was ready to deposit refundable amount in monthly instalments. Bail conditioned on immediate first instalment and strict adherence to future payment terms with explicit warning of revocation.

What did the court decide?

Granted provisional bail upon depositing first instalment of Rs.50,000 within eight weeks and furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Nathuni Ram Vs The State Of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.63696 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-152 Year-2018 Thana- SAHAR District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Nathuni Ram S/o- Late Munshi Ram Resident of Village- Lasarhi (Azadnagar Tola), P.S. Agiaon, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Has Mishra-Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar-A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-12-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶13

learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶14

Petitioner while was Principal of a Middle School, was entrusted with money appertaining to Rs.5,70,000/- in order to construct three rooms of the school by the department. In likewise manner, one Vidya Bhushan Chaudhary was provided Rs.6,92,000/- for the same purpose at different place, out of which, the work so done at his end appertaining to Rs.4,89,247/and so, Rs.2,02,753/- still remains due.

¶15

On query, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is ready to deposit, but in instalment. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor do concede that State Exchequer, which has been digested at the end of the petitioner would be returned back.

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63696 of 2018(2) dt.04-12-2018 2/2

¶17

Petitioner would deposit Rs.50,000/- (fifty thousand) per month and the first instalment should be deposited on the day of surrendering of the petitioner within eight weeks from today, failing which the order impugned will evaporate and further, on that very condition, petitioner, Nathuni Ram , in the event of arrest or surrender is granted provisional bail till saturation of the amount, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate10th, Ara in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No.152 of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Rest amount be deposited on monthly basis. Further, having been failed to deposit single instalment will deprive the petitioner to enjoy the privilege.

¶18

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)

¶19

vikash/-

¶20

U T

Nathuni Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nathuni Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muneshwar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Kanhaiya Sah and or. Vs the State of Bihar

Shamsad Dewan and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Chaudhary @ Nitish Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Kamruddin and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar