Allowed

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Ram and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC16 Apr 2018CR. MISC./6133/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous appeal regarding anticipatory bail in a case under Section 498A IPC alleging dowry-related torture. The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner no. 1 subject to furnishing a bond and surrendering within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner no. 1 granted anticipatory bail subject to surrender within six weeks and furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties.

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Ram and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6133 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1271 Year-2016 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- Bhabhua (Kaimur)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Ram, son of Gulab Ram,

¶5

Gulab Chand Ram @ Gulab Ram, son of Late Sanehi Ram, Both are Residents of Village- Sigathi, P.S.- Bhabhua, District Kaimur, Bhabhua.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar.

¶9

Rinku Devi, wife of Deepak Ram, Daughter of Uma Shankar Ram, Resident of Village- Sigathi, P.S.- Bhabhua, District Kaimur, Bhabhua at present residing at Village Dumar Pokhar, P.S. Mohania, District Kaimur, Bhabhua.

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 16-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no. 1 and

¶14

learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner no. 1 is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Allegation against the petitioner no. 1 is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶17

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner no. 1 has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner no. 1. The petitioner no. 1 has falsely been implicated

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6133 of 2018(3) dt.16-04-2018 2/2

¶19

in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶20

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner no. 1 is named in the Complaint Case.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner no. 1, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Complaint Case No. 1271 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

Pankaj/-

¶23

U T

¶24

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Ram and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Ram and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rinku Prasad Barnwal Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajiv Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Rai @ Sunil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Usha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar