Allowed

Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Apr 2018CR. MISC./21470/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving liquor smuggling offences. The court directed the petitioner to surrender within six weeks and deposit a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount within six weeks, subject to CrPC conditions.

Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21470 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2017 Thana -KASHICHAK District- NAWADA

¶4

====================================================== Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Singh, S/o Ramashish Singh, R/o Vill-Kochgaon, P.S.-Warsaliganj, Distt.-Nawada.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ramchandra Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 13-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶7

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 272, 273 of the IPC and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶8

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 873 liters wine is said to have been recovered.

¶9

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 873 liters wine is recovered from Pickup Van in question. The Pick-up Van in question does not belong

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21470 of 2018 (2) dt.13-04-2018

¶11

2/2

¶12

to the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused Ashok Kumar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

¶13

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-II-cum-Special Judge, Nawada, in connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No. 69/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶15

U.K./U T

¶16

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bishundeo Thakur Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Murari Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Rinku Prasad Barnwal Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithlesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar