Allowed

Md. Tarique @ Tarique v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Apr 2018CR. MISC./6061/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a bail petition arising from an Indian Penal Code case involving offences of 323, 341, 493, 120B, 313 and 354B. The court allowed bail post-framing of charge or after two months of custody, subject to surety conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted after framing of charge or after two months of custody, subject to bond and surety conditions.

Md. Tarique @ Tarique Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6061 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- ARRARIA

¶3

====================================================== 1. MD. TARIQUE @ TARIQUE, S/o Md Rustam, Resident of VillageMajgama, Ward No.- 1, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Nagna Praveen .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahendra Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Pd ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶5

3 04-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶6

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 493, 120B, 313 and 354B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

Complaint based allegation would reveal that the petitioner was in physical relation with the complainant on the pretext of marriage.

¶8

Submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 07.11.2017. The investigation of the case is already complete. The informant is a consenting party.

¶9

Though the informant was noticed in this case, however, no one appears on her behalf.

¶10

Considering the entire facts aforesaid, let the

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6061 of 2018 (3) dt.04-04-2018

¶12

2/2

¶13

petitioner, above named, be released on bail after framing of the charge or after period of custody of two months from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Mahila Police Station Case No. 44 of 2016, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶14

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶15

Kundan/-

¶16

U T

Md. Tarique @ Tarique v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Tarique @ Tarique v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Pappu Choudhry and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Nandlal Singh @ Nandlal Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhiraj Kumar Choudhary @ Dhiraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Hasibur Rahman @ Raja Vs The State Of Bihar