Allowed

Dhiraj Kumar Choudhary @ Dhiraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Apr 2018CR. MISC./18710/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner, who was in custody since 08.11.2017. The petitioner had not been subjected to a Test Identification Parade and nothing was recovered from his possession despite the investigation being complete. The high court directed his release subject to cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount, conditioned upon cooperation with the trial.

Dhiraj Kumar Choudhary @ Dhiraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18710 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -469 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Dhiraj Kumar Choudhary @ Dhiraj Kumar, Son of Late Chitranjan Choudhary, Resident of village- Koshi Colony, P.S.- Birpur, DistrictSupaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar.

¶6

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Panchanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 04-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶8

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Sections 379/413/414/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The FIR of the theft of motorcycle is against unknown.

¶10

Submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 08.11.2017. However, he was never put on Test Identification Parade nor anything has been recovered from his possession. Petitioner was simply remanded from some other case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. The investigation is complete and the petitioner is ready to cooperate

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18710 of 2018 (2) dt.04-04-2018

¶12

P2/

¶13

with the trial.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid submission, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with K. Hat P.S. Case No.469 of 2017, with condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶15

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶16

Mkr./-

¶17

U T

Dhiraj Kumar Choudhary @ Dhiraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhiraj Kumar Choudhary @ Dhiraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Pappu Choudhry and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Tarique @ Tarique Vs The State Of Bihar

Nandlal Singh @ Nandlal Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Hasibur Rahman @ Raja Vs The State Of Bihar