Allowed

Rajpal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Sept 2018CR. MISC./57708/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an IPS case involving IPC offences including causing hurt and criminal intimidation, directing release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to specific conditions of behavior and attendance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, subject to four conditions.

Rajpal Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.57708 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2018 Thana- ROH District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajpal Yadav, S/o Laugi Yadav, Resident of Village- Bangali Bigha, P.S.Giriyak, District- Nalanda at present Resident of Village- Roh, P.S.- Roh, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 19-09-2018

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is in custody since 29.03.2018 in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 34 of 2018 for the offence registered under Section 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 354(D),504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to renew his prayer for bail in view of the order dated 19.07.2018, whereby, this court had grant liberty that the petitioner renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 23.08.2018 the charge against the petitioner has now been framed. Therefore, he may be extended the privilege of

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57708 of 2018(2) dt.19-09-2018 2/3

¶16

bail.

¶17

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and considering the fact that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and that he will abide by the terms and conditions imposed by this court. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, 1^st Nawada, in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 34 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:-

¶18

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

¶19

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶21

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the

¶22

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57708 of 2018(2) dt.19-09-2018 3/3

¶23

State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶25

khushbu/-

¶26

U T

Rajpal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajpal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Vs Kalpana Kumari

Bindeshwar Rai and Ors. Vs Arjun Rai and Ors.

Most.Srimati Devi @ Nurjahan Vs Md.Raj Ali @ Md.Raza Ali

Raju Pandit Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Subodh Prasad Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Sweta Pathak Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.