An oral order where the Court heard counsel on an application for anticipatory bail in a criminal case. The petitioner withdrew the application and the appellate court dismissed the same accordingly.
The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34100 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2013 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran
======================================================
Raju Pandit, S/o Motar Pandit, Resident of Village- Belwatiya, Sukul Pakar, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 150 of 2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A), 120 (B)/34,372 of the Indian Penal Code.
As prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the present application of anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anjana Mishra, J)
khushbu/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail ought to be allowed or dismissed.
Raju Pandit
The State of Bihar
Ramchandra Mali
Anjana Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
