Allowed

Rishu Kumar Yadav @ Rishi Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC28 Sept 2018CR. MISC./57490/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regarding a complaint of kidnapping for marriage, the Court considered the victim's statement under Section 164 CrPC and the petitioner's character, directing release on bail if arrested.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each in event of arrest or surrender within six weeks.

Rishu Kumar Yadav @ Rishi Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.57490 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2018 Thana -BAHERI District- DARBHANGA

¶3

====================================================== Rishu Kumar Yadav @ Rishi Kumar Yadav, son of Ramakant Yadav, Resident of Village- Hanuman Nagar, Baskatti, Haridih, P.S.- Baheri, District- Darbhanga (Bihar).

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 28-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶6

counsel for the State.

¶7

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No.71 of 2008 registered under Sections 363 and 366-A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the victim went out of her own sweet will with the petitioner to Delhi and after staying for 3-4 days, she came back and her statement has already been recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure wherein she has not made any allegation that she was abducted for the purpose of marriage or forced or seduced to illicit intercourse with another person. He

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57490 of 2018 (2) dt.28-09-2018

¶10

2/2

¶11

contended that the instant case has been registered only on account of wild suspicion. The petitioner has got roots in the society having no criminal antecedent and is not likely to abscond or tamper with the evidence.

¶12

Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer

¶13

for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

¶14

Considering the submissions made above, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Darbhanga in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No.71 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶15

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

¶16

Md.S./-

¶17

U T

Rishu Kumar Yadav @ Rishi Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishu Kumar Yadav @ Rishi Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parmeshwar Mandal and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Raghu Nath Prasad and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Yogendra Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Sao Vs The State Of Bihar

Sipahi Rai Vs The State Of Bihar