Allowed

Madhur Kumar Singh @ Madhur Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 Feb 2018CR. MISC./5683/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Madhur Kumar Singh @ Madhur Singh in connection with PS Case No. 443 of 2017. The order mandated release upon surrender or arrest within four weeks, subject to a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount to be surrendered or released upon arrest within four weeks.

Madhur Kumar Singh @ Madhur Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5683 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -443 Year- 2017 Thana -PARWATTA District- KHAGARIA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Madhur Kumar Singh @ Madhur Singh, Son of Ram Bahadur Singh, Resident of Village-Rampur Thuthi, Police Station-Parbatta, DistrictKhagaria.

¶4

The State of Bihar

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶6

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 09-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶8

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Parbatta P.S.Case No. 443 of 2017 registered under Sections 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act.

¶9

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no recovery of any incriminating weapon was made from the petitioner. In the First Information Report instituted by the informant Sanjay Sah, the allegation is that one Balli Singh, who was possessing a country made pistol and cartridge, was overpowered and was produced before the police in presence of the petitioner but subsequently the Investigating Officer of the

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5683 of 2018 (2) dt.09-02-2018

¶11

2/2

¶12

case is trying to implicate the petitioner also in the alleged offence.

¶13

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the application for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. He submitted that in course of investigation materials have been collected against the petitioner and there is no statutory bar to implead a witness to the FIR as an accused.

¶14

Be that as it may, regard being had to the nature of allegation, the petitioner, who is said to be a man of clean antecedent, is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. 1^st , Khagaria in connection with Parbatta P.S.Case No. 443 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶15

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

¶16

Pradeep/-

¶17

U T

Madhur Kumar Singh @ Madhur Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhur Kumar Singh @ Madhur Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shokat Ali and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Bimal Chandra Mishra Vs State and Ors.

Vicky Thakur @ Vicky Kumar Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar

Baudh Manjhi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar Prasad and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.