Petitioner sought permission to withdraw criminal miscellaneous application citing prior arrest; court treated application as withdrawn and dismissed it without substantive argument.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.53020 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1529 Year- 2016 Thana -BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHOJPUR
====================================================== Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Yadav @ Manbhog Yadav, S/o Chhotu Yadav @ Chhathu Simgh, R/o vill.- Masharia , P.S.- Murar , District- Buxar.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER
2 12-09-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application since petitioner has already been arrested.
The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
S.Ali/-
U T
Sandeep Kumar
The State of Bihar
Harendra Singh
Sanjay Priya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
