Allowed

Dinesh Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2018CR. MISC./52943/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to Dinesh Tanti who faced arrest in a theft case where his name surfaced only in a co-accused confession. Bail allowed upon surrender within six weeks subject to bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail on surrender within six weeks with bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties subject to Section 438(2) CrPC.

Dinesh Tanti Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.52943 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -788 Year- 2017 Thana -NATHNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR

¶3

====================================================== 1. Dinesh Tanti, Son of Late Ram Prasad Tanti, Resident of VillageDicruge Lane, Narga, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar.

¶6

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

¶8

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶10

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case initially registered under Section-379 of the Indian Penal Code and later on 411 of the Indian Penal Code was added.

¶11

The prosecution case, in brief, is that Dan Peti of courtyard of Budiya Kali Mandir, was stolen by unknown thieves.

¶12

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in confessional statement of co-accused. There is no other substantial evidence to suggest the implication of

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52943 of 2018 (2) dt.20-09-2018

¶14

Page 2 of 2

¶15

the petitioner in the present case. There is no recovery of any incriminating articles from possession of the petitioner.

¶16

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner’s name surfaced in confessional statement of co-accused.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 788 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶19

A.K.V./-

¶20

U T

Dinesh Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Arun Kumar Srivastava and Ors.

Suranjit Sahani @ Sunarjeet Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithlesh Ravidas and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Arjun Chandravanshi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Janam Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar

Anshu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar