Dismissed

Anshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2018CR. MISC./52847/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for anticipatory bail under Sections 363, 365, and 366 of the IPC, the Court rejected the plea. The judge declined bail despite the petitioner's denial of force, noting the victim's corroboration under Section 164 Cr.P.C., but permitted bail consideration upon surrender.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner directed to surrender and file for regular bail.

Anshu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.52847 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2018 Thana- PATNA CITY CHOWK District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anshu Kumar son of Sri Binod Prasad resident of Mohalla - Chiraiyatand, P.O. - Lohiyanagar, P.S. - Kankarbagh, Town & District - Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indra Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 20-09-2018

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chowk P.S. case No.183 of 2018 registered under Sections 363, 365 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Smt. Niharika, A.C.J.M. II, Patna City.

¶13

Allegation is that the petitioner kidnapped the wife of the informant and forcibly committed intercourse with her.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. From the statement of the victim, it is evident that she had gone on her own will. There was no force applied on her by the petitioner.

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52847 of 2018(2) dt.20-09-2018 2/2

¶16

The allegation of sexual abuse made by the victim is denied by the petitioner.

¶17

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. The victim girl in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. supported the allegations made in the F.I.R.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected.

¶19

If the petitioner surrenders before the court below and prays for regular bail, same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Narendra/-

¶22

U T

Anshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Arun Kumar Srivastava and Ors.

Suranjit Sahani @ Sunarjeet Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithlesh Ravidas and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Arjun Chandravanshi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Janam Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar

Dinesh Tanti Vs The State Of Bihar