The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application for non-prosecution as the Petitioner was absent and no appearance was filed on his behalf.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52038 of 2014 (3) dt.02-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.52038 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 2011 Thana -DARPA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar-1, APP For Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 02-01-2018 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
However, learned Counsel for the Opposite party No. 2 submits that the trial is at the fag end and only the I.O. and the doctor remained to be examined.
The submission is supported by the report received from
the trial court.
However, as none appears on behalf of the petitioner so this application is dismissed for non prosecution.
(Arun Kumar, J.)
Snkumar/-
U T
Tej Narayan Singh
The State of Bihar
Ranju Devi
Arun Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
