Criminal Miscellaneous application seeking quashing of criminal cognizance in an IPC 420 case alleging land sale fraud. The application was dismissed as the court found prima facie ingredients of cheating and presence of a prior title suit was not sufficient to quash criminal proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3053 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -571 Year- 2011 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA
===========================================================
Anand Kumar, Son Of Late Raj Kishore Mahto, Resident Of Mohalla- Tulsi Mandi, P.O. Gulzarbagh, P.S. Alamganj, District- Patna
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
===========================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumr Chandran, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 1, APP
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-01-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 is not present.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3053 of 2014 dt.02-01-2018
2/2
measurement of the land and fixing pillar for marking area, sale deed would be executed, but the same was not done rather the same piece of land was sold to another person.
(Arun Kumar, J)
Sujit/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| UploadingDate | 09.01.2018 |
| Transmission Date |
09.01.2018 |
Anand Kumar
State of Bihar
Raj Kumar Mahto
Arun Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
