Allowed

Nilesh Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC25 Sept 2018CR. MISC./51752/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged dowry harassment and affray. The bail was subject to surrender within six weeks and compliance with conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within six weeks on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Nilesh Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.51752 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Nilesh Kumar Singh S/o Jitendra Prasad Singh, R/o Vill.- Maheshpur, P.S.Muffasil, District- Munger.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Nandani Devi W/o Nilesh Kumar Singh.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Rita Verma

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 25-09-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51752 of 2018(2) dt.25-09-2018 2/2

¶18

the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Angira Kumari, Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Munger in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 24/17, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

Pankaj/-

¶23

U T

Nilesh Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilesh Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arjun Chandravanshi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Janam Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar

Dinesh Tanti Vs The State Of Bihar

Vivek Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sabir Ali @ Sabeer Ali @ Sabbir Ahmad and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ritesh Ram Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.