This single-judge oral judgment dismissed a petition for anticipatory bail. The court declined to grant relief, observing that the substantial recovery of liquor bottles indicated a commercial venture for sale.
Petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51665 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2018 Thana -MOKAMAH District- PATNA
===========================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 20-09-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51665 of 2018 dt.20-09-2018
2/2
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Sanjeev/-
| AFR/NAFR | |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | |
| UploadingDate | 20.09.18 |
| Transmission Date |
20.09.18 |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners faced with allegations of running an illegal liquor business.
Whether the recovery of liquor from the father's house warrants broadening the scope of implication for the sons.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lakshman Kumar
Kanhaiya Kumar
The State of Bihar
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
